🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation and Ideology

For example, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Order: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.