🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.